facat
/
distributionnetwork-power2current
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
98 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 1.9 MiB
Commit Graph

98 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dmy@lab 116d31e395 修复电压幅值计算方差 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-06-26 11:20:25 +08:00
dmy@lab a740b4e4a6 添加评价迭代次数的统计。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-06-04 11:50:57 +08:00
dmy@lab 5f1a375fa7 修复一个小bug 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-06-03 21:45:35 +08:00
dmy@lab 010dc10f6c 用了Popoviciu's inequality估计电压幅值方程，结果和之前的没什么变化。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-06-03 21:31:09 +08:00
dmy@lab fddb3316bd 加三相不平衡度计算 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-21 14:50:06 +08:00
dmy@lab 6b78384380 加入138算例，加入一些并行代码。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-20 21:01:52 +08:00
dmy@lab f7d3e5747c R/X=8 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-16 22:31:18 +08:00
dmy@lab 9385ef2269 增加修改的69节点算例 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-16 15:49:16 +08:00
dmy@lab fa1a29c86b 改用误差传递的方差确定方式 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-08 17:36:59 +08:00
dmy@lab 3dd10280c7 修改为只只有不存在实时数据的时候才加到不等式中，收敛速度快很多。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-05 22:35:55 +08:00
dmy@lab eb7782ead1 修复一个收敛判据的bug，也不知道是不是bug，哈哈 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-04 21:08:14 +08:00
dmy@lab 932716ceb1 加到104节点，删掉一些没用的注释 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-05-04 20:55:55 +08:00
dmy@lab b3892896ec 这个是100%最好的参数 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-30 14:27:39 +08:00
dmy@lab b57e14a499 1.加大系统算例 
2.这个是0%最好的参数。

Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-30 14:24:41 +08:00
dmy@lab 04e95a448e 加计算时间的统计 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-26 14:39:53 +08:00
dmy@lab 286caf83a4 加一个小的理论验证代码片段 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-07 10:39:04 +08:00
dmy@lab e7f32f1be9 考虑量测配置 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-06 16:03:00 +08:00
dmy@lab 562b209ec8 1.改用新算例。 
2.考虑负荷曲线不准确情况。
3.修改统计中的大循环，修复统计错误的问题。

Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-06 11:51:26 +08:00
dmy@lab a7141734c0 修复一个大错字的千年错误！！！ 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:38:43 +08:00
dmy@lab 9b8769071b AME里面用的应该是真实值，搞错了。已修复。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:25:48 +08:00
dmy@lab fa03721b18 之前搞错了，其实可以用量测量做负荷曲线。之前是把三序顺序搞错了。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:15:39 +08:00
dmy@lab b6a1f8058c 不能用测量值当负荷曲线，不然上下界不准。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 16:42:51 +08:00
dmy@lab 0ad8514b6a 编制了新的节点文件。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 15:55:54 +08:00
dmy@lab 4543616833 换一个更简单的计算上下界的方法。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 22:08:07 +08:00
dmy@lab 92c16fac04 修复了计算AME的一个错误。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:58:55 +08:00
dmy@lab 0e591ca2f9 采用新的电压幅值和相角Absolute Mean Error 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:56:45 +08:00
dmy@lab 28c5270e87 加入了确定不等式上下界的代码。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:12:37 +08:00
dmy@lab 69ba28f2a9 按我硕士论文中的推导，用了新的电压幅值权重计算。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 10:35:11 +08:00
dmy@lab 361909bcde 如果用量测值确定不等式上下界容易出现不收敛的问题。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 10:06:11 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 37bbf6fc86 三相功率太平衡了，不收敛。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-10 15:23:20 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 7d05bcee3a 改了迭代的初值 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-10 15:14:11 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 0b8015e9d0 修复了目标函数二次导数中一个系数的bug。不过这个系数的取值还需要考虑一下。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-04 16:33:34 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 1c2b53d2b5 修复了目标函数求导的错误。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-04 11:19:08 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 5357f5edcf 小修改了一下三序测试 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-03 22:05:02 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3f0363fadd 1.加一个文件做不平衡度的测试 
2.果然，如果三相比较平衡的话，零序和负序就会是一个比较小的数，上下界取得不好就不容易收敛。

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-02 10:41:34 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk cf4c3d14c5 还在调试 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-17 22:22:39 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk fb4b9cd9a0 小修改 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 13:56:12 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 8210c96601 先把目标函数注释掉了。奇怪，没有用真实平衡节点电流居然这么好收敛？！！ 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 11:51:07 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 00a4cfad44 有点问题 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 11:37:18 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3db4877bb7 改了一下目标函数，又不收敛了。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-10 22:33:39 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk d411972751 如果虚拟电压方差太小，就会不容易收敛。要限制方差太小。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-10 10:21:23 +08:00
facat@ipso fb1bde0e22 用虚拟电压做量测量居然不收敛了。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-10 00:19:51 +08:00
facat@ipso 0f4d416ca0 把测试文件的代码改好了。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-09 23:28:36 +08:00
facat@ipso 3a1655112a 加入一个test.m的文件做测试用。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-09 23:04:41 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 25b73ebad2 加了一些量测评价的代码。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-09 22:25:47 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 92469a3004 换了一种计算序量测量的方式。 
用最大误差作为量测误差。

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-09 21:52:19 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 77dd602671 删掉一些注释，先吧bar图形隐掉。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-05 12:06:13 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3875907756 修改了数据文件，不要电容了。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-04 22:14:13 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 0c9c2e2eb7 1.添加了画柱状图的函数 
2.加了结果展示代码

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-03 11:07:25 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 971d2e3455 修复了最后算原始电压时的bug，例如SEIf0=I0r+1j*I0r;写成了SEIf0=I0r+1j*I0i; 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-30 11:45:43 +08:00