facat
/
distributionnetwork-power2current
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
80 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 1.9 MiB
Commit Graph

80 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dmy@lab a7141734c0 修复一个大错字的千年错误！！！ 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:38:43 +08:00
dmy@lab 9b8769071b AME里面用的应该是真实值，搞错了。已修复。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:25:48 +08:00
dmy@lab fa03721b18 之前搞错了，其实可以用量测量做负荷曲线。之前是把三序顺序搞错了。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 17:15:39 +08:00
dmy@lab b6a1f8058c 不能用测量值当负荷曲线，不然上下界不准。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 16:42:51 +08:00
dmy@lab 0ad8514b6a 编制了新的节点文件。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-02 15:55:54 +08:00
dmy@lab 4543616833 换一个更简单的计算上下界的方法。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 22:08:07 +08:00
dmy@lab 92c16fac04 修复了计算AME的一个错误。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:58:55 +08:00
dmy@lab 0e591ca2f9 采用新的电压幅值和相角Absolute Mean Error 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:56:45 +08:00
dmy@lab 28c5270e87 加入了确定不等式上下界的代码。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 16:12:37 +08:00
dmy@lab 69ba28f2a9 按我硕士论文中的推导，用了新的电压幅值权重计算。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 10:35:11 +08:00
dmy@lab 361909bcde 如果用量测值确定不等式上下界容易出现不收敛的问题。 
Signed-off-by: dmy@lab <dmy@lab.lab>
 2015-04-01 10:06:11 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 37bbf6fc86 三相功率太平衡了，不收敛。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-10 15:23:20 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 7d05bcee3a 改了迭代的初值 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-10 15:14:11 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 0b8015e9d0 修复了目标函数二次导数中一个系数的bug。不过这个系数的取值还需要考虑一下。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-04 16:33:34 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 1c2b53d2b5 修复了目标函数求导的错误。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-04 11:19:08 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 5357f5edcf 小修改了一下三序测试 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-03 22:05:02 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3f0363fadd 1.加一个文件做不平衡度的测试 
2.果然，如果三相比较平衡的话，零序和负序就会是一个比较小的数，上下界取得不好就不容易收敛。

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-12-02 10:41:34 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk cf4c3d14c5 还在调试 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-17 22:22:39 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk fb4b9cd9a0 小修改 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 13:56:12 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 8210c96601 先把目标函数注释掉了。奇怪，没有用真实平衡节点电流居然这么好收敛？！！ 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 11:51:07 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 00a4cfad44 有点问题 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-11 11:37:18 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3db4877bb7 改了一下目标函数，又不收敛了。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-10 22:33:39 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk d411972751 如果虚拟电压方差太小，就会不容易收敛。要限制方差太小。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-10 10:21:23 +08:00
facat@ipso fb1bde0e22 用虚拟电压做量测量居然不收敛了。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-10 00:19:51 +08:00
facat@ipso 0f4d416ca0 把测试文件的代码改好了。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-09 23:28:36 +08:00
facat@ipso 3a1655112a 加入一个test.m的文件做测试用。 
Signed-off-by: facat@ipso <facat@ipso>
 2014-11-09 23:04:41 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 25b73ebad2 加了一些量测评价的代码。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-09 22:25:47 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 92469a3004 换了一种计算序量测量的方式。 
用最大误差作为量测误差。

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-09 21:52:19 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 77dd602671 删掉一些注释，先吧bar图形隐掉。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-05 12:06:13 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3875907756 修改了数据文件，不要电容了。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-04 22:14:13 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 0c9c2e2eb7 1.添加了画柱状图的函数 
2.加了结果展示代码

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-11-03 11:07:25 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 971d2e3455 修复了最后算原始电压时的bug，例如SEIf0=I0r+1j*I0r;写成了SEIf0=I0r+1j*I0i; 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-30 11:45:43 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk ebc7882194 删掉了注释掉的牛顿法求解方法 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-29 21:58:02 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 4c2f16c8c7 先不考虑电容 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-29 21:56:38 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 7409723aae 添加把结果转换会三相值 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-29 21:26:39 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 098fe0e7c1 l<=I<=u 的约束方式调通了。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-29 21:09:38 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk c1efa7e6a8 修复了目标函数一次导数的一个bug。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-29 17:45:58 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk d81d1fd26e 改一种电流约束的形式，还没改完，正在进行中…… 2014-10-28 22:43:23 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 420ac03a92 改一种电流约束的形式，还没改完，正在进行中…… 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 20:52:21 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 401b698c37 把方程加到目标函数中。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 17:02:55 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk a3b1c5a30e 如果不置0置1的话，潮流方程又不平衡了，还是该回来。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 15:58:55 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 4544a6d009 由于是直角坐标下写的，平衡节点不要置0置1，否则有问题。 
现在好了，只把电压放目标函数中，电压误差就为0了。

Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 15:43:08 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 3c173fde9e 准备把不等式先去掉。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 15:15:03 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 058671a01b 把电压放目标函数中，电流移除目标函数。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 14:50:04 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk ec67f3a775 加了3序。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 12:08:01 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 607d118eca 验证了一下，好像是对的。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 11:52:15 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 17412d8ec5 把原来的OPF重新加入这里面，收敛了，但总觉得有地方不太对。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 11:42:44 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 9de3ff5b2d 把算例也保存进去 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-19 10:24:13 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk 81e04f0748 还在找错误，没调好. 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-18 22:58:30 +08:00
dugg@lab-desk e861147774 把内点法循环单独放到一个函数文件中。 
Signed-off-by: dugg@lab-desk <dugg@lab-desk>
 2014-10-18 21:24:17 +08:00